5820k cinebench3/14/2023 The 5820K matches the 3960X, showing the progression of CPU generational development.ģDPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. Results are given in frames per second.Ĭonverting 4K video gets another step in the preference for more cores in Hybrid x265. Hybrid is a new benchmark, where we take a 4K 1500 frame video and convert it into an x265 format without audio. Interestingly the 4930K beat the 4960X in the Creative Suite with no obvious explanation. PCMark v8 relies on a number of factors, and it would seem that frequency is preferred over cache and memory. After this comes the 4790K, and then the 990X on par, showing how far three generations of Intel CPU have developed.Ī new addition to our CPU testing suite is PCMark8 v2, where we test the Work 2.0 and Creative 3.0 suites in OpenCL mode. Interestingly the x圆0X CPUs are ahead of the xx30K CPUs followed by the xx20K. WinRAR is a variable thread workload, but more cores still wins out. Interestingly the large 元 cache of the 5960X also helps here against the 5820K, despite the 5820K having a higher single thread frequency. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.ĭolphon loves single core speed and efficiency, meaning the 4790K wins out again. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. This benchmark runs a Wii program that raytraces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. That being said, the 5820K is less than 40% of the price and is only 1.2 minutes behind. many cores: check our Bench database for more detailed results but overall the 5960X comes out on top. Photoscan's four separate components rely on different amounts of high frequency vs. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. The 5930K and 5820K are both behind the 4960X however.Īgisoft Photoscan – 2D to 3D Image Manipulation: linkĪgisoft Photoscan creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. For 4K conversion the problem becomes more parallel and the extra cores of the 5960X push it ahead of the pack. The variable turbo speeds of the CPUs results in a small difference in low quality conversion, and the high single core frequency of the 4790K wins there. Results are given in terms of the frames per second processed, and HandBrake uses as many threads as possible. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.įor HandBrake, we take two videos (a 2h20 640x266 DVD rip and a 10min double UHD 3840x4320 animation short) and convert them to x264 format in an MP4 container. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that the CPU manufacturer would prefer they used. The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, with both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |